# App: Waypoint types

**URL:** <https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821>\
**Category:** Implemented features\
**Tags:** implemented\
**Created:** [March 16, 2020, 5:08pm UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821 "2020-03-16T17:08:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SchlesiM](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/schlesim/32/1080_2.png) [@SchlesiM](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/SchlesiM)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2020, 10:27pm UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821/20 "2020-04-07T22:27:32Z")

</div>

Looks great. I’m really looking forwards to test the new features (didn’t appear in my app updates yet) 😃.

One question prior to my first tests: will the options of the rerouting mode distinguish between regular waypoints and shaping points?

 ![wp-navigation](https://forum.kurviger.com/uploads/default/original/2X/e/e0f99b2c3fe10993611bb1c1db5adb7c4f2e7814.jpeg)

I mean: will the option “next unvisited waypoint” automatically omit shaping points and focus only on the next regular waypoint in the route?

If so: will there be an additional rerouting option considering both types (something like “next unvisited way- or shaping-point”)?

And of course: by introducing shaping points you created a new challenge for the Kurviger website to support a corresponding feature (with an appropriate integration into the app) 🕶.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821)._
