# Rerouting and waypoint types **URL:** \ **Category:** App\ **Created:** [October 27, 2020, 8:28am UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/rerouting-and-waypoint-types/4423 "2020-10-27T08:28:55Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![0709](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/0709/32/4699_2.png) [@0709](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/0709)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 8:28am UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/rerouting-and-waypoint-types/4423/1 "2020-10-27T08:28:55Z")
Hello Emux. I will sure test that new Beta. What surprised me a bit in the current user version: “Navigation Mode Strict” Kurviger applies Strict for both the Via AND the Lower Priority Shaping Points. Can it possibly remain a little less so not strict for the Shaping Points? Only the announced Via points so obtain “Strictly Must Pass” imposed. Must Pass Via Points without name or description can also be discreetly silent. And so are +/- comparable to “Not Announced” than “Free Pass” Shaping Points. Do you possibly want to test this in the Beta ? (I hope this FREE suggestion (designer ultimately decides) will not throw “thunder and lightnings” at my head.) ---
**Author:** ![devemux86](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/devemux86/32/6239_2.png) [@devemux86](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/devemux86)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 8:40am UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/rerouting-and-waypoint-types/4423/2 "2020-10-27T08:40:44Z")
Please see the related topic where the final details were based on previous community discussion: _(also it’s better to discuss new suggestions in their own separate topics)_ > [@App: Waypoint types](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821/108): > > [https://forum.kurviger.com/t/kurviger-1-13-11-beta/2855](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/kurviger-1-13-11-beta/2855) has some changes: Via points (named or not) participate properly in turn instructions and navigation (panels). [Shaping points](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821/3) are the ones that obviously don’t alert on arrival. Via + shaping points participate equally in navigation actions, like rerouting, skip next, etc. Option “Settings | Routing | Waypoints in instructions” remains for those who need it. And can change all waypoint types simultaneously with one click in the w… ---
**Author:** ![Tom](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/tom/32/168_2.png) [@Tom](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/Tom)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 9:06am UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/rerouting-and-waypoint-types/4423/3 "2020-10-27T09:06:36Z")
> [@0709](#): > > Can it possibly remain a little less so not strict for the Shaping Points? For me it is absolutely ok as it is… strict should mean strict, also including shaping points. When you don’t need a shaping point, you can delete it and let Kurviger find the route or use next or nearest waypoint. It was a long and hard discussion to get the strict mode as it is. I don’t want to lose it. ---
**Author:** ![rumbrummer](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/rumbrummer/32/113_2.png) [@rumbrummer](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/rumbrummer)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 11:35am UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/rerouting-and-waypoint-types/4423/5 "2020-10-27T11:35:36Z")
> [@0709](#): > > Can it possibly remain a little less so not strict for the Shaping Points? > Only the announced Via points so obtain “Strictly Must Pass” imposed. As far as I understand you can achieve that just by switching off the “strict” mode and use “next waypoint” instead: > [@App: Strict navigation](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-strict-navigation/2284/8): > > No, that’s current workflow. Like mentioned already cannot have every feature everywhere as they affect each other. Strict route following is: But perhaps I misunderstood … ---
**Author:** ![devemux86](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/devemux86/32/6239_2.png) [@devemux86](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/devemux86)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 12:05pm UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/rerouting-and-waypoint-types/4423/6 "2020-10-27T12:05:59Z")
Via and shaping points participate equally in all navigation actions: rerouting (all modes), skip next waypoint, etc. In strict navigation must follow waypoints order. (but can exit / enter route _between_ waypoints) See the mentioned link for a summary of the final details: (could follow the discussion to see community’s rationale) > [@App: Waypoint types](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821/108): > > [https://forum.kurviger.com/t/kurviger-1-13-11-beta/2855](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/kurviger-1-13-11-beta/2855) has some changes: Via points (named or not) participate properly in turn instructions and navigation (panels). [Shaping points](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821/3) are the ones that obviously don’t alert on arrival. Via + shaping points participate equally in navigation actions, like rerouting, skip next, etc. Option “Settings | Routing | Waypoints in instructions” remains for those who need it. And can change all waypoint types simultaneously with one click in the w… ---
**Author:** ![Viola](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/viola/32/12413_2.png) [@Viola](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/Viola)\ **Post date:** [November 19, 2025, 3:11pm UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/rerouting-and-waypoint-types/4423/8 "2025-11-19T15:11:05Z")