# Strictly follow all SPs and WPs mode incl. skip waypoints

**URL:** <https://forum.kurviger.com/t/strictly-follow-all-sps-and-wps-mode-incl-skip-waypoints/10076>\
**Category:** Planned features\
**Created:** [January 19, 2023, 5:54am UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/strictly-follow-all-sps-and-wps-mode-incl-skip-waypoints/10076 "2023-01-19T05:54:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WalterG](https://forum.kurviger.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/f0a364/32.png) [@WalterG](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/WalterG)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2023, 12:12pm UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/strictly-follow-all-sps-and-wps-mode-incl-skip-waypoints/10076/14 "2023-01-20T12:12:49Z")

</div>

> [@grauhaar](#):
>
> Was ich auch immer mache ist die Trackaufzeichnung mitlaufen zu lassen. Somit weiß ich immer welchen Teil der Strecke ich schon gefahren bin

Das hilft nur, wenn das Gerät mit der App im Sichtbereich ist. Mit dem Gerät z.B. in der Jackentasche nur mit Srachführung hilft das **während der Fahrt** leider nicht.

> [@zaphod\_42](#):
>
> I have not needed “Strict Route Navigation” so far.

That may be. Perhaps you don’t leave the route or only in not so complicated sections. Then there are no disadvantages when using non-strict navigation.

“Strict Route Navigation” in the beginning was very strict. Each waypoint (shaping points and via points) had to be touched in same order as calculated, when not skipped with rerouting. On some requests later the “strict” was no more as strict. There are exceptions. It’s hard to describe this exceptions. And it’s very astonishing how well the “Strict route navigation” works when leaving the route and returning to the route in complicated sections.  
Therefore I understand Toms request for the “Strict Route Navigation”.

EDIT1: Nachträglich eingetragen: **während der Fahrt**

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/strictly-follow-all-sps-and-wps-mode-incl-skip-waypoints/10076)._