# Website: Multiple route profiles

**URL:** <https://forum.kurviger.com/t/website-multiple-route-profiles/1157>\
**Category:** Implemented features\
**Created:** [January 25, 2019, 11:35am UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/website-multiple-route-profiles/1157 "2019-01-25T11:35:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 71

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![devemux86](https://forum.kurviger.com/user_avatar/forum.kurviger.com/devemux86/32/6239_2.png) [@devemux86](https://forum.kurviger.com/u/devemux86)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2021, 7:01pm UTC](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/website-multiple-route-profiles/1157/71 "2021-01-09T19:01:38Z")

</div>

> [@rumbrummer](#):
>
> And due to the distributed development of web and app it is inavoidable that new features are not implemented in parallel - the alternative would be to retain new options - I can not imagine that anyone prefers that option.

Remember how much earlier the application had implemented the [waypoint names](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-names/2820) and [waypoint types](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/app-waypoint-types/2821).

The most important thing is not to break the compatibility.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.kurviger.com/t/website-multiple-route-profiles/1157)._
