Hi,
I had next waypoint. Because I was of the opinion, with strict, the navi always leads me back to the abandoned point. It should only calculate the few meters of detour.
There ist no nearest way point to select.
I will test it next time. Would it work with BRouter?
BR
Manne
That is based on user preference and in Kurviger long ago users have preferred a flexible navigation model where can exit and enter the route anywhere.
Strict navigation was introduced in latest Beta after requests to navigate in a strict model. So should select that option if really want strict route following.
What app version do you use, Kurviger 1.12.4 or Kurviger 1.13.16 (Beta)?
There is no âNext waypointâ in latest Beta, only:
Routing service is irrelevant to navigation or rerouting, itâs used only to calculate routes.
Sorry, but alone images cannot help understand the meaning of reports.
(cannot understand the route, where you were, where waypoints were)
So you used latest Beta with âNearest waypointâ? Then result was normal.
Next time you should try âStrict navigationâ, recommended for round trips.
Or we replace âNearest waypointâ with âNext waypointâ for better rerouting.
Or you go back to give all the options back. If possible, you can place beginner, standard or experts the options menu, so that user can set what they want. more or less options 
Manne
offtopc,
where ist the disussion about the designâŚ? I use a chinese device witch works in landscape format, so some infos are too smallâŚ
Cannot do that, options must be simplified and easily maintainable.
We discuss here final sane options that most users will find useful.
By the way have you tried âStrict navigationâ or not?
Or else this discussion has not further meaning. 
Certainly not hereâŚ
Please create new topics for new questions.
I use the next waypointâŚnext time I will try strict !
Again, there is no âNext waypointâ in settings, please read them carefully.
Currently there are:
I will think if we need further improvements or a replacement for first one.
you are right ânächstgelegener Wegpunktâ
Manne
Maybe âstrict navigationâ should be the default after installation 
Hmm, then we would loose the âflexible versionâ that allows automatically skipping of waypoints.
âNext waypointâ and âstrict navigationâ donât differ that much.
See my explanation above âHow do this rerouting options behave?â
No, all options except strict navigation are flexible ones: exit / resume anywhere skipping waypoints.
Their difference is how the rerouting is calculated, using nearest or next waypoint after user location.
Since âNearest waypointâ can snap near the end skipping many waypoints and erasing middle route,
a safest option seems âNext waypointâ. Then is âNearest waypointâ needed too or keep less options?
Ok, then âNext waypointâ seems to be the safest option.
This should then be the default, as it would work in most situations the way people would expect it.
I donât think we need a third option
Sorry folks, you drive me crazy with all this rerouting options. 
I definitly will just use âBrainâ to find back to the route. 
Sometimes I would prefer Next waypoint and sometimes Nearest waypoint.
The âStrict navigationâ until now i didnât use. But there are other users prefering this option.
And sometimes i wish a option âDestinationâ to come from location quickly to the destination (skipping the not yet visited waypoints except destination).
Therefore I would prefer 4 options: Nearest waypoint, Next waypoint, Destination, Strict navigation,
The most sane + simple options covering most needs seem:
Implemented in Kurviger 1.13.17.
âRerouting modeâ setting was renamed to âNavigation Typeâ in Kurviger 1.14.28,
as it affects many more things in navigation than just rerouting.
