I would find it extremely helpful for parallel planning of a list of waypoints if the travel time (e.g. from the start) were always displayed in the format hh:mm for all waypoints.
Currently, when exceeding 24 hours, the format switches to dd:hh. This results in a loss of accuracy in minutes.…
Best regards, Christian
I agree, we already have this on our list actually 
… quite important at a distance of ~1500 km. 
Especially since the precision of travel time has already been discussed several times here.
Really?
Ich bin auch dafür, daß Format bei hh:mm zu lassen, wobei bei längeren Zeiten mm auch wegfallen könnte. Wenn da dann 32 h steht und man 6 Stunden pro Tag fahren möchte, rechnet man schnell gute 5 Tage Fahrzeit aus.
If you ever come across planning a 4week 6000km thing, you will start to calculate in hrs/day. Yes, it is relevant.
My answer referred to precision in minutes, not hrs/day. Even in a day trip of ~300 km minutes become irrelevant - see this posts regarding the accuracy of ETE: Berechnung der Fahrzeit unrealistisch - Estimated time inaccurate for "fastest available" routes
Nevertheless anyone planning a 6,000 km trip in one Kurviger route should think about that.
